Though the government shutdown remains unpopular with many Americans, pet breeders around the country have greeted the news with a sigh of relief. For once in their recent history, they can operate their businesses without the perpetual harassment of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), a government agency that frequently collaborates with extreme animal rights activists to make it more difficult to raise and own animals in this country. Upon the re-opening of the USDA, pet breeders will be subject to a new rule from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), which would broadly expand their ability to regulate small businesses. Under the new rule, any pet breeder who sells even one of their animals over the internet, phone, or mail will now be subjected to the onerous licensing and inspection requirements of the federal Animal Welfare Act.
Under current law, retail pet stores and small hobby breeders are
not required to comply with the Animal Welfare Act. The proposed APHIS rule would
strip this exemption from any breeder who uses the internet, phone, or mail to
sell their pets, as many have chosen to do in the modern economy. During a
conference call unveiling the rule, APHIS clarified that if a breeder sells even
one animal in a location other than where the animal was bred, that
breeder would then be subject to the AWA. They refer to this change as “closing
a loophole.” In actuality, it is a vast expansion of the regulatory
jurisdiction of the federal government.
Many Americans have chosen to obtain their pets from small
hobby breeders, as these dogs have a reputation of being some of the
best-socialized pets in the industry.
Bringing a small breeding establishment into compliance with these rules
is estimated by APHIS to cost as much as $5000, a prohibitively expensive sum
for many. In addition, these small
breeders would be potentially subject to fines up to $10,000 for
non-compliance, a risk that has many opting to instead close up shop for
good.
As this rule will require countless thousands of additional
inspections to occur, the estimated costs to the taxpayer for the
implementation of this regulation are astronomical. The USDA assures us, however, that the costs
are justified by the “improved animal welfare” that will result from this
rule. Yet, no study has been done as to
the nature of the positive results from the rule, and they continue to refuse
to quantify the supposed benefits that the public should expect.
The purported reason for the proposed change is to ensure that
all pets sold to consumers sight-unseen are delivered in a healthy condition.
Their Notice
of Proposed New Rulemaking observes that the USDA has received “some”
reports in recent years of dogs purchased over the internet arriving in bad
health. APHIS then goes on to mind-bogglingly admit that they have no
evidence to suggest that this situation occurs at any greater frequency
than dogs purchased directly from a traditional pet store. Nonetheless they claim that a vast expansion
of their regulatory power is immediately necessary in order to address this
crisis.
Unsurprisingly, the rule is being pushed
by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), a group which has a long
history of trying to put breeders out of business. For those unfamiliar with
HSUS, they are essentially PETA in suits,
and they raise hundreds of millions of dollars a year from sappy commercials
picturing abused dogs, while spending
less than 1% of that money per year on the actual care of animals. The
rest, of course, is spent lobbying on behalf of their radical agenda to make
animal ownership and consumption prohibitively expensive. HSUS is calling the
new rule “a huge step forward for the welfare of dogs in puppy mills.” A “puppy
mill” is the affectionate term used by HSUS to describe all dog breeding
establishments.
For many
years, the HSUS has been working to put dog breeders out of business in order
to make adoptions the only viable means of obtaining a pet. They know that during hard economic times,
hobby breeders cannot afford to comply with these costly federal regulations.
Unfortunately, the Obama administration is coordinating with radical activists
to implement job-killing policies through the rule-making powers of bureaucrats
with no oversight from Congress. We all
know that the government will again be open for business before long. For many breeders, that will only mean the
beginning of the end of the establishments they spent years to create.
Phil Christofanelli is the Director of Public Affairs for The Cavalry Group, a member based company protecting and defending the Constitutional and private property rights of law abiding animal owners, animal-related businesses, sportsmen, and agriculture concerns legally nationwide.
Phil Christofanelli is the Director of Public Affairs for The Cavalry Group, a member based company protecting and defending the Constitutional and private property rights of law abiding animal owners, animal-related businesses, sportsmen, and agriculture concerns legally nationwide.
"During a conference call unveiling the rule, APHIS clarified that if a breeder sells even one animal in a location other than where the animal was bred, that breeder would then be subject to the AWA."
ReplyDeleteThis statement needs to be corrected The rule requires the breeder, puppy and buyer to meet face to face. That meeting can take place anywhere. In the November 21st APHIS webinar, Dr. Rushin even said such a meeting "could take place in a Walmart parking lot (if Walmart allows it.)"
The people who need regulation are many of the "dog flippers", affectionately called "rescues", who try to make a quick buck (or up to several hundred $$$$.) and a non profit job/salary in the name of compassion, COMPETING with breeders and DEFAMING them, while not themselves being subject to regulation that is ALREADY CLEARLY LAID OUT in the Animal Welfare Act for ANIMAL CARETAKERS. The government does nothing to enforce those rules that are ALREADY IN THE LAW! ( like Immigration????)
ReplyDeleteCheck out Craigslist or Rescueme.org. Its a"used Dog" car lot. Puppy breeders not allowed, but adoption fees?? Go for it!
ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO ADOPTS OUT DOGS FOR A FEE MUST BE LICENSED AND REGULATED. LET'S PLAY FAIR!
I couldnt agree more!! Rescues are becoming a "politically correct" dog mill with no regulations or taxes. and believe me, they rescue puppies too.
DeleteThese rules should be for puppy mills not repeatable responsible breeds!
ReplyDelete